Pet Care & Protection Laws @ Grassroots Animal Rights

The care, treatment and well being of domesticated and wild animals.

October 13, 2008

Waiting For The Vet

Filed under: Veterinarians — admin @ 12:50 pm

In cases of sudden illness, accidents and injury to pets, very often the efficiency of the first aid rendered by owners, while waiting for the vet, makes all the difference between a speedy recovery and serious trouble.

If an animal is injured or shows symptoms of serious illness, the vet should be called immediatly and the animal kept as quiet as possible. If it shows a desire to be left alone, by all means allow it to retreat into a dark corner if there is nothing constructive to be done. Get people out of the room and take all steps possible to decrease noise in the house, even to the extent of turning off doorbell, provided there is someone on the look-out for the vet.

Sometimes, injured or sick animals will have to be restrained. Injuries and some diseases cause the animal to hurl themselves about. If you have to deal with a pet in this condition, think of yourself first and put on whatever you can find in the way of protective c1othing, a heavy overcoat and gloves, for example. If the animal is biting and scratching, throwing itself blindly into furniture and otherwise showing signs of severe shock, the best thing is to throw a blanket over it and then wrap it in the folds, leaving only the head uncovered. The animal, if small, can then be held until the vet arrives and will thus be prevented from knocking itself senseless on the legs of tables and chairs. Cats in a state of violent shock, can be dangerous. The blanket method is the best with cats but if nothing is available to use as a wrapping and the cat has to be picked up, it should be grasped firmly by the scruff of its neck, held well away from one’s person and then carefully deposited in a basket, box or similar container. If broken bones are suspected, the animal should not, of course; be moved unless it is in danger of further injury from passing traffic or other causes.

Really big dogs, in a state of frenzy, are also dangerous and may bite owners and bystanders. If the animal is capable of running, it is doubly dangerous and before it can take. off and disappear into the distance, it should be secured. Often this is more difficult than one would imagine. In the first place, any attempt to muzzle it brings the hand within biting distance and secondly, any attempt to hold the animal by the neck and bandage its mouth is a job for two people and there may be no volunteers. The best method of restraining a large dog is to grasp it quickly by the scruff, get its head between one’s knees and hang on.

In cases of poisoning, telephone the vet immediately and if you are fortunate enough to know definitely the substance that has caused the trouble, tell the vet, who may advise you to administer the appropriate remedy. But if you do not know what the animal has taken, give an agent to induce vomitting before doing anything else. A strong salt solution should have the desired effect. Do not give oils or fats if phosphorus poisoning is suspected.

Fits are fairly common among puppies and the symptoms, the mad dashing and shrieking, the leaping and contortions can be frightening. A vet should be called but first, doors and windows should be closed and guards placed in front of open fires. Best advise is to leave the animal alone if it is indoors when the fit occurs and allowing it to retreat into a dark corner. However, to the untrained eye, a fit is not easy to disgnose: the same symptoms could be caused by injury or poisoning, foreign bodies in the throat and many other misfortunes: it is best to call a vet even if the animal appears to have succumbed. It is better to treat a dead body than not to treat a live one.

October 3, 2008

How To Report Cruelty To Animals

Filed under: Animal Rights — admin @ 2:01 pm

If you have concerns that an animal is being abused, or think someone is killing animals without just cause, you may be that animals (or others) only hope.

What To Do First
First, find out which local organization is in charge of investigating and enforcing cruelty to animals laws in your state, county, or town. this may be the SPCA (Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), Humane Society, or a funded animal shelter. When in doubt, you can contact local police.

If you think the animal is not in an immediate danger, check your local animal protection laws at a local library, city hall, or an online search. Most animal protection laws can be found on this site by state. Make a copy of the law you believe to be in question, and be ready to show your findings to the authorities. For the most part, causing an animal unnecessary suffering is illegal. This can mean anything from beating an animal to neglecting food, fresh water, or shelter, to killing an animal.

If you believe an animal or other animal are in a life threatening situation, contact local authorities immediately. Follow up with them in a timely matter check their findings. If they do not respond, contact PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) immediately.

Once you figure out which law enforcement agency to contact (and you know the animals) are not in immediate danger, provide them with a short, to the point, factual written statement, with the key information of what you observed with dates and approximate times, and location. Evidence gathering in a timely matter is crucial, as the more time that passes, the greater risk there is to specifics being forgotten, witness not being found, evidence disappears, and injuries will be healed up, etc.

If possible, pictures or video tapes with date and time. This will secure your case, and a written statement from witnesses will back up your surveillance.

Keep record of everyone you talk to. Authorities or otherwise. Dates and times you talked to them. And what the outcome of your conversation was. Never pass pictures, letters, statements, etc. without keeping a copy for yourself. Make it clear that you will stay involved, lend your assistance if necessary, and follow this case, and follow up. The more you stay involved, the more authorities will.

Authorities should get a visual inspection of the animals) in question, and if possible get a hand on exam (referred to as “palpating” the animal) in order to find injuries or unhealthy physical and/or living conditions. Authorities are often fooled by a dog who “enthused” by him being there. The animals “happy” behavior does not mean it is safe. The animal may be starved for attention, or anxious to please. The scene should be thoroughly inspected for any indication that abuse has occurred. Suspects and neighbors (potential witnesses) should be interviewed. If the investigator agrees that your complaint is real, a warning may be issued, charges filed, a warrant served, and/or the animals) removed.

Keep following up with the case, many animals have been saved from peoples persistence. If you feel the authorities are not doing a satisfactory job, go straight to their supervisors (such as the mayor, prosecutors, city officials, or county commissionaires. Even a call to TV or newspapers can make a HUGE difference. New coverage often gets authorities in the right gear, and/or get the person in question to stop what he’s doing. This can also motivate others with their past events of animal abuse.

 
When in doubt, call PETA for help. Advocating your own animal abuse case can be heart breaking and difficult, but they are counting on you to have the strength to come forward. PETA will give guidance and support, or if local officials do not act quickly to your claim.

PETA can be reached day or night @ (757) 622-7382 and dial 2.

September 26, 2008

Internet Hunting

Filed under: Animal Rights — admin @ 6:51 pm

Internet hunting (also called cyber hunting or computer-assisted remote hunting) allows a person with an Internet connection to fire a rifle from virtually anywhere, killing real prey in “real time.”

Supporters of the practice say it is a way to allow people with disabilities to enjoy the thrill of hunting. Critics say it is not hunting; it is killing and it violates the rules of “fair chase.” Internet hunting has been strongly criticized by the Humane Society of the United States (which calls it pay-per-view slaughter); pro-hunting groups, including the National Rifle Association; and animal rights advocates, among others.

At least 35 states, including all the New England states, but not Connecticut, have banned Internet hunting. Opponents are seeking a federal ban. Two bills currently before Congress (HR 2711 and S. 2422) would prevent the operation of websites allowing Internet hunting (http: //www. govtrack. us/congress/bill. xpd?bill=s110-2422). A 2007 bill (HB 6570) to ban the practice in Connecticut died on the House Calendar.

INTERNET HUNTING AND LEGISLATION

Internet hunting emerged as an issue in 2005 when a Texas businessman launched the website www. live-shot. com promoting the practice as “a real time on-line shooting experience.”

For a $ 14. 95 monthly fee and deposit towards the cost of the animal he or she wished to kill, a subscriber with a high speed Internet connection could log on to the website at a scheduled time and, using a remote controlled . 22 caliber rifle with a webcam mounted on it, shoot animals at a private game farm in Texas. Employees at the farm would lure the animal the subscriber ordered to a feeding station within range of the rifle. When the animal approached, the subscriber used the computer mouse to line up the cross hairs and clicked the mouse to discharge the rifle. Employees at the farm finished the job if the hunter missed. (It appears, after visiting www. live-shot. com, that the remote hunting service is no longer offered. )

September 15, 2008

Work Environment

Filed under: Veterinarians — admin @ 4:10 pm

Veterinarians in private or clinical practice often work long hours in a noisy indoor environment. Sometimes they have to deal with emotional or demanding pet owners. When working with animals that are frightened or in pain, veterinarians risk being bitten, kicked, or scratched.

In large-animal practice spend time driving between their office and farms or ranches. They work outdoors in all kinds of weather and may have to treat animals or perform surgery, under unsanitary conditions.

Working in nonclinical areas, such as public health and research, have working conditions similar to those of other professionals in those lines of work. These veterinarians enjoy clean, well-lit offices or laboratories and spend much of their time dealing with people rather than animals.

Often work long hours. Those in group practices may take turns being on call for evening, night, or weekend work; solo practitioners may work extended and weekend hours, responding to emergencies or squeezing in unexpected appointments.

Animals in Research

Filed under: Animal Rights — admin @ 4:07 pm

Title 42 - The Public Health and Welfare
 Chapter 6A - Public Health Service
  Subchapter III - National Research Institutes
  
Part H - General Provisions
 Sec. 289d. Animals in Research
(A) The Secretary, acting through the Director of NIH, shall establish guidelines for the following:
 (1) The proper care of animals to be used in biomedical and behavioral research.
 
 (2) The proper treatment of animals while being used in such research. Guidelines under this paragraph shall require:
   (A) the appropriate use of tranquilizers, analgesics, anesthetics, paralytics, and euthanasia for animals in such research;
   (B) appropriate pre-surgical and post-surgical veterinary medical and nursing care for animals in such research.
   Such guidelines shall not be construed to prescribe methods of research.
   
 (3) The organization and operation of animal care committees in accordance with subsection (b) of this section.
 
 
(B) Animal care committees; establishment; membership; functions
 (1) Guidelines of the Secretary under subsection (a)(3) of this section shall require animal care committees at each entity which conducts biomedical and behavioral research with funds provided under this chapter (including the National Institutes of Health and the national research institutes) to assure compliance with the guidelines established under subsection (a) of this section.
 
 (2) Each animal care committee shall be appointed by the chief executive officer of the entity for which the committee is established, shall be composed of not fewer than three members, and shall include at least one individual who has no association with such entity and at least one doctor of veterinary medicine.
 
 (3) Each animal care committee of a research entity shall:
   (A) review the care and treatment of animals in all animal study areas and facilities of the research entity at least semi-annually to evaluate compliance with applicable guidelines established under subsection (a) of this section for appropriate animal care and treatment;
   
   (B) keep appropriate records of reviews conducted under subparagraph (A); and
   
   (C) for each review conducted under subparagraph (A), file with the Director of NIH at least annually (i) a certification that the review has been conducted, and (ii) reports of any violations of guidelines established under subsection (a) of this section or assurances required under paragraph (1) which were observed in such review and which have continued after notice by the committee to the research entity involved of the violations.
   
 Reports filed under subparagraph (C) shall include any minority views filed by members of the committee.
 
 
(C) Assurances required in application or contract proposal; reasons for use of animals; notice and comment requirements for promulgation of regulations The Director of NIH shall require each applicant for a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement involving research on animals which is administered by the National Institutes of Health or any national research institute to include in its application or contract proposal, submitted after the expiration of the twelve-month period beginning on November 20, 1985:
 (1) assurances satisfactory to the Director of NIH that:
   (A) the applicant meets the requirements of the guidelines established under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) of this section and has an animal care committee which meets the requirements of subsection (b) of this section; and
   (B) scientists, animal technicians, and other personnel involved with animal care, treatment, and use by the applicant have available to them instruction or training in the humane practice of animal maintenance and experimentation, and the concept, availability, and use of research or testing methods that limit the use of animals or limit animal distress; and
   
 (2) a statement of the reasons for the use of animals in the research to be conducted with funds provided under such grant or contract.
 
Notwithstanding subsection (a)(2) of section 553 of title 5, regulations under this subsection shall be promulgated in accordance with the notice and comment requirements of such section.
(D) Failure to meet guidelines; suspension or revocation of grant or contract. If the Director of NIH determines that:
 (1) the conditions of animal care, treatment, or use in an entity which is receiving a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement involving research on animals under this subchapter do not meet applicable guidelines established under subsection (a) of this section;
 
 (2) the entity has been notified by the Director of NIH of such determination and has been given a reasonable opportunity to take corrective action; and
 
 (3) no action has been taken by the entity to correct such conditions;
 
the Director of NIH shall suspend or revoke such grant or contract under such conditions as the Director determines appropriate.
(E) Disclosure of trade secrets or privileged or confidential information. No guideline or regulation promulgated under subsection (a) or (c) of this section may require a research entity to disclose publicly trade secrets or commercial or financial information which is privileged or confidential.

August 12, 2008

Internet Hunting By State

Filed under: Animal Rights — admin @ 8:52 pm

Table 1 shows 35 states that have banned Internet hunting. (Samples of legislation are attached. )

Table I: States that Ban Internet Hunting

State Penalty

Alaska Class A misdemeanor (up to $ 10,000 fine, up to one year imprisonment) (Alaska Stat. §§ 16. 05. 797, 12. 55. 035, and 12. 55. 135)
Alabama Misdemeanor ($ 2,000-$ 5,000 fine, up to 30 days prison term, or both for first offense; at least $ 5,000 fine and 10 to 30 days imprisonment for subsequent offense) (Ala. Code §§ 9-11-501, 9-11-505)
Arkansas Civil penalty of $ 500-2,000 (Ark. Game and Fish Commission Reg. § 18. 22)
California No penalty specified (Cal. Fish and Game Code § 3003)
Delaware No penalty specified (Del. Code Ann. tit. 7 § 704(h))
Florida Penalty not specified (Fish and Wildlife Commission rule § 68A-4. 001, effective July 1)
Georgia High misdemeanor ($ 1,000 to $ 5,000 fine, up to 12 months imprisonment, or both) (GA. Code Ann. § 27-3-12)
Idaho Misdemeanor ($ 25 to $ 1,000 fine, up to six months imprisonment, or both) (Idaho Code §§ 36-1101(b)(8) and 36-1402)
Illinois Class B misdemeanor (up to six months imprisonment, up to $ 1,500 fine) to hunt on the Internet; class A misdemeanor (up to one year imprisonment, up to $ 2,500, or both) to provide software or services to help someone hunt on the Internet. Person who facilitates the practice (e. g. , landowner or computer programmer) is guilty of class A misdemeanor (520 ILCS 5/2. 33b and 5/3. 5(c))
Iowa Serious misdemeanor (first violation); D felony (subsequent violation); plus possiblecivil penalty of up to $ 10,000 (Iowa Code § 481A. 125A)
Kentucky No penalty specified (Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 150. 363)
Louisiana Class 6 violation ($ 900 to $ 950 fine, imprisonment for up to 120 days, or both) (La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 56: 116. 5 and 56: 36)
Maine Class E crime to own or operate commercial game shooting area for remote control hunting (up to $ 1,000, up to 6 months, or both) (Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. Tit. 12 § 12103 & 7 §§ 1344 & 1347)
Maryland Misdemeanor (fine up to $ 10,000, imprisonment for up to one year or both) (MD. Code. Ann. Nat. Res. § 10-426)
Massachusetts Imprisonment for up to 21/2 years, fine up to $ 2,500, or both (Mass. Gen. Laws Chap. 131: § 65A)
Michigan Misdemeanor (up to 93 days prison term, fine up to $ 500, or both for first offense; up to one year prison term, up to $ 1,000, fine, or both for subsequent offense (Mich. Stat. Ann. §§ 750. 236a, 750. 236b, and 750. 236c)
Minnesota Unclassified misdemeanor (up to 90 days imprisonment, up to $ 1,000 fine, or both) (Minn. Stat. § 97B. 115)
Mississippi Class I offense ($ 2,000 to $ 5,000 fine and five days imprisonment) (Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-7-68 and 49-7-141)
Missouri Penalty not specified (Missouri Wildlife Code § 10-7. 410(1)(R))
Nebraska Class II misdemeanor (up to six months imprisonment, up to $ 1,000 fine, or both, plus civil fine of at least (1) $ 250 for a first offense and (2) $ 500 for subsequent offense) (Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 37-572 and 28-106)
New Hampshire Class A misdemeanor for natural person (up to one year imprisonment, up to $ 2,000 fine, or both); felony for other than natural person, plus possible civil penalty of at least $ 10,000 in either case (N. H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 207: 8-a and 651. 2)
New Jersey Up to $ 500 civil penalty per violation (N. J. Rev. Stat. § 23: 4-24. 5 and 23: 4-24. 6)
New Mexico Misdemeanor (up to six months imprisonment and fine (amount unclear) (N. M. Stat. Ann. §§ 17-3-49, 17-2-10)
New York Up to $ 2,500 civil fine (N. Y. ECL §§ 11-1906 and 71-0923(10))
North Carolina Class 1 misdemeanor (N. C. Gen. Stat. §§ 113-294q and 113-291. 1A)
Oregon Requires State Fish and Wildlife Commission to adopt rules (ORS § 496. 146(20))
Pennsylvania 3rd degree misdemeanor (up to one year imprisonment, fine up to $ 2,500 or both (18 PA. Code §§ 7641 and 106)
Rhode Island Misdemeanor (fine up to $ 1,000, imprisonment up to one year, or both) (R. I. Code §§ 20-1-25 and 11-1-2)
South Carolina At least $ 5,000 fine, up to one year prison term, or both for first offense;up to $ 10,000 fine, up to five years imprisonment, or both, for subsequent offense (S. C. Code Ann. § 50-11-95 and 16-1-20)
Tennessee Class A misdemeanor (imprisonment for up to 11 months and 29 days, fine up to $ 2,500, or both (Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 70-4-501 to 504 and 40-35-111(e))
Texas Class B misdemeanor (up to $ 2,000, up to 180 days imprisonment, or both) for first violation;Class A misdemeanor (up to $ 4,000, up to one year imprisonment, or both) for subsequent violation (Parks and Wildlife Code Ann. § 62. 002 and Penal Code §§ 12. 21 and 12: 22)
Vermont Civil fine up to $ 1,000 (VT. Stat. Ann. §§ 10-4715 and 4515)
Virginia Class 1 misdemeanor (up to $ 2,500 fine, up to 12 months imprisonment, or both (Va. Code Ann. §§ 29. 1-530. 3 and 18. 2-11)
West Virginia No penalty specified (W. Va. Code Ann. § 20-2-5(29))
Wisconsin Ban applies only to farm raised deer; No penalty specified (2005 Wisconsin Act 35)VR: dw

August 3, 2008

Veterinarians

Filed under: Veterinarians — admin @ 8:02 pm

Veterinarians care for the health of pets, livestock, and animals in zoos, racetracks, and laboratories. Some veterinarians use their skills to protect humans against diseases carried by animals and conduct clinical research on human and animal health problems. Others work in basic research, broadening our knowledge of animals and medical science, and in applied research, developing new ways to use knowledge.

Most veterinarians diagnose animal health problems; vaccinate against diseases, such as distemper and rabies; medicate animals suffering from infections or illnesses; treat and dress wounds; set fractures; perform surgery; and advise owners about animal feeding, behavior, and breeding.

According to the American Medical Veterinary Association, more than 70 percent of veterinarians who work in private medical practices predominately, or exclusively, treat small animals. Small-animal practitioners usually care for companion animals, such as dogs and cats, but also treat birds, reptiles, rabbits, ferrets, and other animals that can be kept as pets. About one-fourth of all veterinarians work in mixed animal practices, where they see pigs, goats, cattle, sheep, and some wild animals in addition to companion animals.

A small number of private-practice veterinarians work exclusively with large animals, mostly horses or cattle; some also care for various kinds of food animals. These veterinarians usually drive to farms or ranches to provide veterinary services for herds or individual animals. Much of this work involves preventive care to maintain the health of the animals. These veterinarians test for and vaccinate against diseases and consult with farm or ranch owners and managers regarding animal production, feeding, and housing issues. They also treat and dress wounds, set fractures, and perform surgery, including cesarean sections on birthing animals. Other veterinarians care for zoo, aquarium, or laboratory animals. Veterinarians of all types euthanize animals when necessary.

Veterinarians who treat animals use medical equipment such as stethoscopes, surgical instruments, and diagnostic equipment, including radiographic and ultrasound equipment. Veterinarians working in research use a full range of sophisticated laboratory equipment.

Veterinarians contribute to human as well as animal health. A number of veterinarians work with physicians and scientists as they research ways to prevent and treat various human health problems. For example, veterinarians contributed greatly in conquering malaria and yellow fever, solved the mystery of botulism, produced an anticoagulant used to treat some people with heart disease, and defined and developed surgical techniques for humans, such as hip and knee joint replacements and limb and organ transplants. Today, some determine the effects of drug therapies, antibiotics, or new surgical techniques by testing them on animals.

Some veterinarians are involved in food safety and inspection. Veterinarians who are livestock inspectors, for example, check animals for transmissible diseases, such as E. coli, advise owners on the treatment of their animals, and may quarantine animals. Veterinarians who are meat, poultry, or egg product inspectors examine slaughtering and processing plants, check live animals and carcasses for disease, and enforce government regulations regarding food purity and sanitation. More veterinarians are finding opportunities in food security as they ensure that the Nation has abundant and safe food supplies. Veterinarians involved in food security often work along the Nation’s borders as animal and plant health inspectors, where they examine imports and exports of animal products to prevent disease here and in foreign countries. Many of these workers are employed by the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service division.

Copyright © 2008 Pet Care @ Grassroots Animal Rights. All Rights Reserved.